I have to admit it, but Andrew Garfield’s take is way better
than Tobey Maguire’s.
![]() |
| Not too keen on the mask's design though. |
Spiderman is Stan Lee’s glorified
take on every Science nerd/misunderstood average geek who only wants to be
heard. I thought when Tobey accepted the role in 2002, he is a miscast
because he looks more of a regular hockey player than a Science geek. Ten years
later, and thanks to Garfield, Spiderman would be revisited with an actor fit for the character.
I am a comic book collector/avid
reader since the age of 8; therefore I take it with great aversion when the characters I grow to love in comic
books fail miserably in any movie adaptation. Some contend that the comic book
characters are very fluid and may take an ample amount of twitching to suit the viewers' preference. But, would that process make it completely
self-serving if the director/producer would only get the famous title or character, but not
the attendant personality?
![]() |
| The death of Gwen Stacey. |
Characters here
are more real than mundane, more in tune with reality rather than being way too
larger than life. My only regret in this movie is the villain, Dr. Curt Connors
played by Rhys Ifans. I thought that The Lizard’s story was way too forced.
Biological warfare to turn everyone into a Lizard. C’mon, are we talking about
the problems of the US now?
Still, I give it four popcorns
out of five. And I can’t wait for its sequel and how they will show the death
of Gwen Stacey.


No comments:
Post a Comment